A discussion on the government practice of civil forfeiture the practice of confiscating assets and

University of Miami Law Review vol. Paz got up from his bed. What happened next was the subject of constantly changing stories, but officials eventually appeared to agree that Paz was kneeling on the floor at his bedside when one of the SWAT officers entered the bedroom and shot Paz twice in the back.

A discussion on the government practice of civil forfeiture the practice of confiscating assets and

Law enforcement agents across the country have been confiscating these assets, without having to secure a conviction and prove any guilt. And once they take the assets cash, house, car etc it is then up to the person to hire their own legal representation to try and fight in order to get their property returned to them.

A discussion on the government practice of civil forfeiture the practice of confiscating assets and

Most people can't afford the thousands of dollars that it is likely to cost them to try and endure the legal battle to seek justice in this sort of situation. And because many people cannot afford it, they are simply going to lose their assets.

Civil asset forfeiture has been deemed an unconstitutional and unjust practice by a variety of legal scholars, civil liberties advocates, various political figures, human rights advocates, and others.

The Constitution sets out protections that are supposed to ensure that an individual has a right to due process. However, if citizens are having their assets confiscated without any conviction of a crime; where's due process?

Related Posts:

One federal judge from Indiana just a few months ago ruled that such actions were in violation of the Constitution, that was because she didn't see it as providing the victims with a timely hearing so that they could try to contest the seizure of their property.

Many states have tried to push back against the practice and set their own rules, requiring a conviction before property can be taken, though the practice is still ongoing in many areas today.

Law enforcement officials, like the former LAPD deputy chief Stephen Downing, have previously said that civil asset forfeiture was first passed under the guise that it would be used to take assets from 'drug kingpins'.

But we can see that it's being used for a lot more than that and more often than not it seems that innocent people are being swept up in it and being wrongfully victimized.

Civil Asset Forfeiture - Ruining Lives, While Failing To Stop Crime | Zero Hedge

There is an effort currently underway in Alabama that is seeking to put an end to this practice of taking property before any criminal conviction is secured. That group consists of various organizations who want the state to make changes so that law enforcement first has to have a criminal conviction before taking anything from American citizens, they want to eliminate the clear profit motive that there is attached to this method of policing.

You shouldn't be considered guilty until proven innocent; a founding principle of justice. There is also a bipartisan group of senators who are looking to eliminate the program to some extent as well.

They want to prevent it from being expanded in the way that Jeff Sessions' had earlier indicated he had planned to do. A group of senators, including Rand Paul, Mike Lee, and others, have recently released a letter that calls for the passage of a law that would restrict the DOJ from enacting civil asset forfeiture programs; seeking to defund the program.The federal Civil Asset Forfeiture Act of made some reforms that help those facing asset forfeiture.

The law now grants people whose assets have been seized the right to legal counsel, as well as providing for the temporary return of seized assets to their owners while investigation is pending, if hardship can be proven.

Both civil and criminal forfeiture involve the taking of assets by police. In civil forfeiture, assets are seized by police based on a suspicion of wrongdoing, and without having to charge a person with specific wrongdoing, with the case being between police and the thing itself, sometimes referred to by the Latin term in rem, meaning "against the property"; the property itself is the defendant and no criminal .

According to a report prepared for the Senate Judiciary Committee, at least 90 percent of the property that the federal government seeks . Police abuse of civil asset forfeiture laws has shaken our nation’s conscience. Civil forfeiture allows police to seize — and then keep or sell — any property they allege is involved in a crime.

A Research Guide to Civil Asset Forfeiture Amy L. Marcina Civil Asset Forfeiture is a highly contentious practice of law enforcement which has gathered the attention of some leading commentators This statute creating the U.S.

Trump DOJ Is Dead Wrong On Civil Asset Forfeiture - Big League Politics

Department of Justice's Assets Forfeiture Fund also provides for equitable sharing with state and local agencies. Asset forfeiture or asset seizure is a form of confiscation of assets by the state. It typically applies to the alleged proceeds or instruments of crime. This applies, but is not limited, to terrorist activities, drug related crimes, and other criminal and even civil offenses.

Asset Forfeiture :: Denise Lieberman